Tel Aviv: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel announced a new partnership with the United Arab Emirates on Thursday to cooperate in the fight against the coronavirus, portraying it as the latest advance in the Jewish State’s efforts to build stronger ties with Arab States.
But Netanyahu’s ebullient description was contradicted a few hours later when the Emirates issued a much more muted statement, announcing what it described as an agreement between two private Emirati companies and two Israeli companies to develop technology to fight the virus.
The Emirati statement took the wind out of what Netanyahu had touted as a diplomatic coup, suggesting that despite the deepening ties, the two countries were still at odds over Netanyahu’s vow to annex parts of the occupied West Bank.
Addressing graduates at an air force base near Tel Aviv, Netanyahu spoke in grand terms of what he described as a new partnership that could benefit the broader West Asia.
“Our ability to work against the corona pandemic can also serve the entire region,” he said. “It creates opportunities for us for open cooperation that we have not known so far with certain countries.”
The partnership would include cooperation in research and development between the Israeli and Emirati health ministries in medical projects related to the coronavirus, he said.
To seal the deal, he said, the two ministries would announce the agreement “in a few moments.”
But it was unclear why the Emirates would agree to take such a public step at a time when Israel was drawing up plans to annex parts of the West Bank, a move that Arab countries, including the Emirates, have repeatedly denounced.
And four hours later, as Israeli officials stewed, the answer came in a Twitter posting from an Emirati Foreign Ministry spokeswoman.
“In light of strengthening international cooperation in the fields of research, development and technology in service of humanity, two private companies in UAE sign an agreement with two companies in Israel to develop research technology to fight COVID-19,” wrote Hend al-Otaiba, the spokeswoman.
There was no mention of a State-to-State partnership between the two countries, which do not have diplomatic relations but whose ties have improved in recent years, and nothing about their health ministries.
It was unclear Thursday whether the two countries had privately reached an agreement that came apart as it was coming to light, or what caused the daylight between the two announcements. But it seemed that Netanyahu’s annexation plans had made Emirati officials uncomfortable with such a public step toward Israel.
Barbara A Leaf, a former US ambassador to the Emirates and a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said it appeared that Netanyahu’s statement had pushed the Emirates into making a statement it was not ready to make.
If stronger State-to-State contacts were in the works, it was clear that the Emirates did not want to make them public.
“They are not on the same page at a point in time when the Israeli government is openly discussing not whether but how much of the West Bank to annex,” Leaf said.
Netanyahu has vowed to annex up to 30 percent of the West Bank as soon as 1 July, a move that much of the world views as a violation of international law and a new barrier to the establishment of a future Palestinian State.
Just two weeks ago, the Emirates’ ambassador to the United States, Yousef al-Otaiba, wrote a landmark article in a leading Israeli newspaper warning Israelis directly that “annexation will definitely, and immediately, reverse all of the Israeli aspirations for improved security, economic and cultural ties with the Arab world and the United Arab Emirates.”
“It’s Either Annexation or Normalisation,” the headline said.
Al-Otaiba did not respond to a request for comment.
A public partnership with the Emirates would have been a political windfall for Netanyahu, who has sought to build ties with Arab countries without making progress on a peace accord with the Palestinians. While some Arab leaders reject the possibility of any ties with Israel, others have long considered an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement a prerequisite for any warming of ties.
In recent years, Persian Gulf monarchies have shifted away from seeing Israel as the oppressor in its conflict with the Palestinians and instead view it as a valuable partner in trade, security and their rivalry with Iran.
Shimrit Meir, and Israeli analyst of the Arab world, said that the announcements Thursday were still significant, despite the apparent miscues.
“Saying we have two private companies cooperating with Israeli companies on COVID: In the language of [West Asia], this is almost unheard-of,” she said.
Noting that the two countries had previously worked together secretly, she said, “I think the outing of this is both important and bold.”
The two countries had collaborated covertly on combating the virus recently, when the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, quietly acquired some equipment Israel needed to fight the coronavirus from Gulf States, according to European news media reports.
While Israel remains deeply unpopular across much of the Arab world, the Palestinian cause has diminished in importance to the region as Arab States have turned inward to deal with economic crises, popular uprisings and the rise of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State.
Persian Gulf countries such as the Emirates and Saudi Arabia have come to see Iran as a primary threat to regional stability and recognised Israel as a potential partner in confronting it.
“The UAE has changed its approach to relations with Israel only in light of the Iranian danger, which they also perceived as threatening to them,” said Eli Avidar, who ran an Israeli mission in Qatar in 1999-2001 is now a member of the Israeli Parliament.
That led to a gradual ramping up of covert dealings with Israel among Gulf States on issues including security, technology, agriculture and most recently health.
Ronen Bergman and Ben Hubbard c.2020 The New York Times Company
from Firstpost World Latest News
0 Comments